Provides for calling a limited constitutional convention (RR INCREASE GF EX See Note)
The discussions surrounding HB 800 highlight the legislative intent to simplify and modernize the governance structure in Louisiana. By transitioning detailed provisions from the constitution to statutory law, proponents argue that the legislature will be better equipped to respond to immediate needs and challenges without the cumbersome process of frequent constitutional amendments. However, this shift raises concerns about the potential loss of constitutional protections and the centralization of power within the legislative branch, which some community advocates view as potentially undermining the stability and foundational principles of governance.
House Bill 800 calls for a limited constitutional convention in Louisiana aimed at addressing the state's constitution, which has been amended over 200 times and contains over 75,000 words. The aim is to streamline the constitution by transitioning detailed provisions into statutory law, thereby allowing the legislature greater flexibility in addressing contemporary issues. The convention is set to convene no earlier than May 30, 2024, consist of 171 delegates comprising legislative members and gubernatorial appointees, and is required to submit a proposed draft of a new constitution by August 15, 2024, for voter consideration during the congressional primary election on November 5, 2024.
The sentiment towards HB 800 is mixed, reflecting broader ideological divides on issues of governance and local autonomy. Supporters perceive the bill as an essential step towards more efficient government and an opportunity to refresh an outdated constitution. Conversely, critics argue that this could lead to unintended consequences, such as diminishing protections for citizens and reducing the checks and balances inherent in a constitutionally rigid framework. This polarization mirrors ongoing debates about the balance of power between state and local authorities and the role of the public in guiding constitutional changes.
Key points of contention within the discussions on HB 800 center around the authority of the proposed convention and the types of changes that can be made. There are provisions to ensure that fundamental rights and principles remain intact, but debates remain over what constitutes 'fundamental law' versus productive legislative flexibility. Concerns also arise regarding transparency and accountability for delegates, as all proceedings of the convention will be subject to open meeting laws and public record regulations, yet the potential for powerful interests to shape the outcomes in favor of more centralized control persists.