Provides for calling a limited constitutional convention and preparations therefor (RE INCREASE GF EX See Note)
The proposed constitutional convention is intended to facilitate a significant overhaul in state laws governing local government, revenue, finance, and education. By enabling a reevaluation of constitutional clauses that are viewed as obstructive, the bill aims to provide the legislative body with greater flexibility when addressing urgent matters such as tax structure and resource allocation. However, the convention's scope will be limited to specified articles of the constitution, and it cannot propose changes that could potentially affect fundamental rights, state indebtedness, or the capital's location.
House Bill 500 calls for the establishment of a limited constitutional convention aimed at addressing structural changes to the Louisiana Constitution. Scheduled to convene on January 6, 2020, the convention will consist of 117 delegates, elected from the state's senate districts, tasked with drafting a new state constitution by May 20, 2020. This initiative stems from legislative findings indicating that the current constitution, having been amended numerous times since 1974, contains provisions that restrict governmental efficacy and adaptability in responding to contemporary needs, especially in social and economic contexts.
The sentiment surrounding HB 500 is mixed. Proponents argue that the convention is necessary for modernization and improved governance, reflecting the evolving needs of Louisiana residents. Critics, however, raise concerns that such sweeping changes may undermine established rights or local autonomy. The bill has sparked significant debate among stakeholders, reflecting broader tensions between maintaining existing rights and adapting to new challenges.
Notable points of contention include discussions about the limits placed on the convention's authority, particularly its inability to modify certain fundamental rights outlined in Article I of the state constitution. Additionally, the fear of potential overreach is present among various advocacy groups who worry about the implications of a new constitution drafted in a highly politicized environment. The bill has also prompted discussions regarding the process for electing delegates and the funding available for the convention’s operations, with calls for transparency in both electoral and financial matters.