Provides for calling a limited constitutional convention and preparations therefor (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)
The introduction of HB 385 underscores the recognition of long-standing challenges within Louisiana's constitutional framework, particularly regarding fiscal constraints impacting both state and local governments. The bill intends for the new constitution to provide more flexibility in allocating resources and addressing essential services like healthcare and education funding. Critics may argue that proposals which significantly alter budgetary processes could lead to instability, yet supporters advocate for the potential economic growth and improved governance efficiency that might arise from clearer fiscal guidelines.
House Bill 385 calls for a limited constitutional convention aimed at addressing key fiscal and governance issues within the state of Louisiana. This legislation proposes the formation of an Evaluation and Drafting Committee tasked with assessing the need for a constitutional convention to potentially reform state funding structures, including education and revenue allocation. If deemed necessary, the convention would convene with 132 delegates on January 6, 2020, to draft a new constitution intended for adoption by the voters during the November 3, 2020, elections.
Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 385 is mixed, reflecting a divide between those who see the necessity of revising the state's constitution to reflect modern governance needs and those concerned about the implications of such changes. Many proponents are motivated by the desire for economic revitalization and targeted funding for critical services, while opponents fear that altering the constitution may dilute protections or result in backtracking on established rights and governance structures.
Notably, the bill contains specific restrictions on the issues the convention can address. Proposed changes are limited to state and local finance, including education funding, while explicitly prohibiting alterations that might infringe on individual rights or change existing assemblies. This constraint has led to discussions about the effectiveness of the proposed changes and whether they will adequately address the wider needs of Louisiana's populace or merely serve a narrow set of interests. Despite its intention for benefit, the tight scope of the convention's mandate could result in contentious debates and challenges.