Provides for calling a limited constitutional convention for fiscal purposes and preparations therefor (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)
The bill's proponents argue that the existing Louisiana Constitution, which has been amended multiple times since its inception in 1974, is overly restrictive and hinders effective governance. Supporters believe that a new constitution can streamline legislation related to revenue raising and allocation, ultimately improving resource management for essential services like healthcare and education. By allowing a constitutional convention to re-evaluate these areas, the bill aims to foster flexibility and innovative solutions to the state's fiscal challenges.
House Bill 323 proposes the calling of a limited constitutional convention aimed at addressing key fiscal and financial challenges within Louisiana. This bill seeks to form a convention that would convene on January 6, 2020, to create a new state constitution, with a deadline for completion set for May 20, 2020. The convention would be limited in scope, focusing only on state and local finance, education funding, and related fiscal issues, which the legislature believes are necessary for enhancing economic growth and adapting to contemporary needs of citizens.
Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 323 appears to be cautious support among legislative members who recognize the need for reform while being wary of comprehensive changes that could affect constitutional rights or existing governmental structures. There is a concern from some residents and advocacy groups about ensuring that local needs and contexts are adequately represented in any new constitutional provisions created by the convention.
Debate around HB 323 highlights points of contention related to the limitations placed on the convention regarding what can be proposed. Opponents have raised concerns that restricting the convention's scope could prevent critical issues beyond finance, such as civil rights or environmental concerns, from being addressed. The bill's proponents need to navigate these potential criticisms carefully, ensuring that the convention can meaningfully contribute to the governance structure without unintentionally neglecting other important state needs.