Louisiana Senate Bill SB418

Louisiana 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/27/24
• Refer: 4/2/24
• Report Pass: 4/17/24
• Engrossed: 4/23/24
• Refer: 4/24/24
• Report Pass: 5/7/24
• Enrolled: 5/23/24
• Chaptered: 5/28/24
• Passed: 5/28/24

Caption

Authorizes the transfer of certain state property in Ascension Parish.

Impact

The impact of SB 418 on state laws pertains primarily to property law and administration. By allowing the transfer of state properties to local authorities, the bill aids in the decentralization of assets and promotes local governance. The authorized entities, such as the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, will be empowered to execute necessary agreements related to these land transfers, thus facilitating local development initiatives and potentially enhancing public utilities or school facilities.

Summary

Senate Bill 418, introduced by Senator Lambert, authorizes the transfer of specific state properties located in Ascension Parish and Bossier Parish. The bill outlines the properties to be transferred, including a parcel of approximately 3.42 acres in Ascension Parish and another parcel of around 37.921 acres, a portion of which is associated with the Bossier Parish School Board. These transfers are designed to facilitate local governance and community development by transferring state-owned land to local entities for further use.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB 418 appears to be positive, particularly among local stakeholders who may benefit from the property transfers. Local governments and the School Board in Bossier Parish would likely view the bill favorably as it provides them with opportunities to utilize state property to meet community needs. However, there could be concerns from citizens regarding the transparency of the property appraisal process and the terms under which the state assets are being transferred.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the management of mineral rights associated with the transferred properties. The bill explicitly states that mineral rights will not be included in the transfer, which could raise concerns among stakeholders about future revenue generation from such resources. Additionally, the efficiency and appropriateness of transferring state properties to local jurisdictions are likely to be scrutinized, with discussions necessary to ensure that these transactions align with the broader public interest.