Louisiana 2024 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB483

Introduced
4/2/24  
Introduced
4/2/24  
Refer
4/3/24  
Refer
4/3/24  
Report Pass
4/9/24  
Report Pass
4/9/24  
Engrossed
4/16/24  
Engrossed
4/16/24  
Refer
4/17/24  

Caption

Provides relative to attorney service contracts. (8/1/24)

Impact

The modification of existing laws could significantly impact the legal landscape regarding attorney fees and client contracts. By ensuring that an attorney's lien does not precede established mortgages or judgments, SB 483 aims to protect the rights of property owners and ensure that mortgage lenders feel secure in their investments. This could also potentially influence how attorneys approach contracts, knowing their interests will be ranked lower than those of mortgage lenders.

Summary

Senate Bill 483, sponsored by Senator Morris, seeks to amend Louisiana's attorney service contracts related to liens and the ranking of privileges. This legislation primarily aims to clarify that liens arising from attorney contracts for service will not hold superior status over mortgages on immovable property or judgments that enforce such mortgages. This change is intended to create a more balanced hierarchy of claims in legal proceedings involving attorneys and property interests.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 483 appears to be supportive among lawmakers who recognize the importance of protecting property interests. There is a focus on maintaining a fair legal environment, especially regarding liabilities tied to attorney services. However, there may be concerns among some attorneys about the implications this could have on their ability to secure payments for their services when representing clients with property claims.

Contention

Notable points of contention are likely to arise in the debate over the balance between attorney rights and property rights. While proponents argue that this bill strengthens consumer protections and clarifies ambiguities in existing law, critics may assert that it undermines attorneys' ability to negotiate enforceable contracts that sufficiently secure their interests in representing clients. The debate may highlight the need for a careful assessment of the implications for both legal practitioners and their clients.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB954

Dental services: third-party network access.

DC B25-0265

Contract No. GAGA-2022-C-0259 with SodexoMagic, LLC Approval and Payment Authorization Emergency Act of 2023

TX SB543

Relating to oversight of and requirements applicable to state contracts and other state financial and accounting issues; authorizing fees.

TX HB1426

Relating to certain requirements applicable to contracts entered into by, and the contract management process of, state agencies.

CA SB681

Public employees’ retirement: contracting agencies: termination.

CA AB848

Public contracts: University of California: California State University: domestic workers.

CA AB2557

Local agencies: contracts for special services and temporary help: performance reports.

MI SB0281

Insurance: health insurers; granting third party access to a dental network contract; allow. Amends 1956 PA 218 (MCL 500.100 - 500.8302) by adding sec. 3406aa.