Louisiana Senate Bill SCR79

Louisiana 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/30/24
• Passed: 5/31/24
• Engrossed: 5/31/24

Caption

Urges and requests the Department of Transportation and Development to conduct an engineering study on the upper Amite River Basin.

Impact

The successful implementation of SCR79 could significantly affect state laws relating to flood control and infrastructure development. By mandating a study that assesses detention and retention strategies, the bill sets the groundwork for potential modifications to current flood management practices. It underscores the need for improved drainage systems, which could involve amending existing local regulations and aligning them with the study's findings. This could empower local authorities to develop effective measures that minimize future flooding disasters.

Summary

SCR79, introduced by Senator Hodges, urges the Department of Transportation and Development to conduct an engineering study on the upper Amite River Basin. This study seeks to evaluate areas capable of detaining or retaining stormwater runoff, particularly in light of the devastating flooding experienced in 2016. Through a systematic approach, the resolution aims to devise solutions for better flood management and contribute to the Stormwater Master Plan initiated in 2017, which outlines a comprehensive strategy to tackle drainage challenges across the region.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SCR79 appears to be supportive among legislators and stakeholders who recognize the urgent need for effective flood management solutions in the wake of recent disasters. The collaboration between the state and local governments through this study is often seen as a positive step towards enhancing public safety and infrastructure resilience. However, there may be underlying concerns regarding funding and resource allocation for the proposed studies and subsequent projects.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential challenges associated with the feasibility and costs of implementing the proposed solutions. Stakeholders may debate the effectiveness of the proposed structural changes and the environmental impacts of creating new detention or retention systems. Additionally, there may be discussions on whether the study’s findings will be comprehensive enough to address all aspects of flooding and drainage issues, including social, economic, and environmental impacts.