Constitutional Amendment to remove the income limitation for persons age sixty-five or older that qualify for the special assessment level for residential property receiving the homestead exemption. (2/3-CA13s1(A)) (1/1/27) (EG DECREASE LF RV See Note)
If passed, the amendment would amend Article VII, Section 18 of the Louisiana Constitution, effectively altering the property tax landscape for senior citizens. It would enable more seniors to qualify for the special assessment level, potentially leading to lower property tax rates for this demographic. This change is set to take effect on January 1, 2027, and would apply to all taxable years thereafter. The approval for the constitutional amendment is destined for a statewide election on November 3, 2026, enabling voters to determine its fate.
Senate Bill 57 proposes a constitutional amendment that aims to remove income limitations for individuals aged sixty-five or older who qualify for the special assessment level for residential properties receiving the homestead exemption in Louisiana. Currently, individuals over this age group cannot benefit from the special assessment if their adjusted gross income exceeds $100,000. The proposed amendment would allow seniors to qualify for the special assessment without being subjected to these income limits, thereby offering them greater financial support through property tax relief.
The sentiment surrounding SB 57 appears generally positive among proponents, who advocate for the financial relief it would provide to senior citizens. Supporters argue that this change is necessary to assist an often vulnerable population facing higher costs of living. However, there may be some contention over the impact this could have on state revenue and potential implications for local governments dependent on property tax income. Critics might raise concerns about whether such tax exemptions could create disparities in revenue generation among different demographics.
Notable points of contention may arise regarding the fairness of removing income limitations specifically for seniors while other age groups continue to face restrictions. Opponents might argue that this creates an unequal system where different age brackets are treated differently concerning property tax liabilities. Furthermore, there is concern about the long-term financial consequences for the state and local governments, which could see a decrease in property tax revenue as a result of this amendment. The discussions will likely highlight the balancing act between providing necessary support to senior citizens and maintaining adequate funding for public services.