Texas House Bill HB2169

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to the security of high-speed rail operated by a private entity.

Impact

The bill's passage is expected to strengthen safety frameworks surrounding high-speed rail systems, thereby potentially increasing public confidence in using such services. By formalizing security requirements, HB2169 aims to safeguard passengers and railway infrastructure from potential threats. The authority to implement these security measures has been assigned primarily to the Department of Public Safety, which will ensure compliance and work in coordination with local law enforcement agencies.

Summary

House Bill 2169 establishes new security protocols specifically for high-speed rail services operated by private entities in Texas. It seeks to enhance public safety measures relating to intercity passenger rail systems that are anticipated to reach speeds of at least 110 miles per hour. The bill mandates that these rail operators adhere to strict security standards that include the establishment of secured zones, operation of screening stations, and provision of onboard security. This measure acknowledges the unique security challenges faced by high-speed rail as transportation technology evolves.

Notables

Additionally, HB2169 emphasizes the need for emergency management training for designated personnel within high-speed rail companies, thereby reinforcing the importance of preparedness in case of emergencies. The requirement for collaboration with state and local emergency management entities also hints at a broader strategy to unify security efforts across different levels of governance, which could enhance overall state security while operating high-speed rail systems.

Contention

Discussions surrounding HB2169 may have included concerns about the financial implications of the required security measures for private rail operators, as the bill stipulates that operators must bear the cost of any state or local law enforcement services utilized. There may be ongoing debates regarding the balance between enhancing security and maintaining affordable and accessible transportation options for the public. Critics might argue that increased security costs could lead to higher ticket prices for consumers, impacting ridership rates.