Texas Senate Bill SB1467

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to the Texas college work-study program and to establishing a program for the off-campus employment of certain students at public or private institutions of higher education.

Impact

The passage of SB1467 is expected to reshape aspects of student employment within higher education by increasing access to work opportunities for those in financial need. The bill mandates that the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board administer the program and develop rules to facilitate its implementation. By funding these positions partially with state resources, the legislation aims to alleviate some financial burdens faced by students, which could lead to higher retention rates and improved educational outcomes as students can work in fields relevant to their studies.

Summary

Senate Bill 1467 aims to enhance the Texas college work-study program by establishing a new program, the Texas Working Off-Campus: Reinforcing Knowledge and Skills (WORKS) Internship Program. This initiative is designed to provide part-time employment opportunities to eligible students attending public or private institutions of higher education in Texas. The bill outlines the criteria for student and employer eligibility, emphasizing the importance of offering jobs that align with the students' academic interests while ensuring that these positions supplement rather than replace regular employee roles.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1467 appears largely positive, with supporters highlighting its potential benefits for financially disadvantaged students. They argue that the program will help bridge the gap between education and employment while providing essential experience in their chosen fields. However, there may be some concerns among those who fear that reliance on state funds for such programs could lead to issues with consistency in funding and program stability over time.

Contention

Notably, there may be contention regarding the adequacy of the state's contribution to the funding of the program. While the bill proposes state support for eligible students, critics might express concerns about sustainability and whether the funding will be sufficient to meet demand, especially during times of economic downturn or budget cuts. Additionally, the definitions and administrative rules established by the coordinating board will be critical in determining the program's success and the extent of its impact on the job market for students.