Relating to measures to facilitate the successful completion of degree and certificate programs by certain adult learners at public institutions of higher education.
Impact
The enactment of HB1053 will significantly impact state laws regarding funding and support mechanisms for adult education. By providing direct financial assistance to adult learners and incentivizing institutions to enhance their support services, the bill aims to reduce barriers faced by non-traditional students in Texas. The funding is capped at $50 million, ensuring that resources are allocated effectively while promoting student success across the state’s higher education framework. Institutions of higher education will have to adapt to these requirements and improve their programs to accommodate and retain adult learners.
Summary
House Bill 1053 is designed to enhance the accessibility and completion rates of degree and certificate programs among adult learners in Texas public higher education institutions. The bill introduces specific provisions, including tuition assistance grants equating to 25% of the average tuition for eligible students aged 25 to 34 who have made significant progress in their academic programs. In addition to financial support, the legislation establishes measures to incentivize institutions to better support and track the academic achievements of adult learners, particularly those who complete their studies in designated high-demand fields.
Sentiment
The general sentiment around HB1053 is positive, with support from various stakeholders who recognize the growing population of adult learners seeking to advance their education. Supporters argue that this bill addresses critical gaps in higher education funding and creates pathways for adult learners to achieve their educational goals, which is increasingly important in a competitive job market. Nevertheless, some concerns have been raised regarding the adequacy of funding and the fairness of eligibility criteria for the grants, which could potentially limit access for some adult learners.
Contention
Notable points of contention include discussions surrounding the funding limits and eligibility criteria for assistance. While the bill aims to provide substantial support for qualifying adult learners, critics have expressed concerns that capping the funding at $50 million may not meet the actual demand or needs of adult learners statewide. Additionally, elements such as the requirement for recipients to be between the ages of 25 and 34, and the percentage of prior degree completion could exclude some individuals who might benefit from the program but do not fit the defined criteria.
Relating to measures to facilitate the successful completion of degree and certificate programs by certain adult learners at public institutions of higher education.
Relating to measures to facilitate the successful completion of degree and certificate programs by certain adult learners at public institutions of higher education.
Relating to measures to facilitate the successful completion of degree and certificate programs by certain adult learners at public institutions of higher education.
Relating to performance incentive funding for public institutions of higher education and to recognition of certain student achievement on degree completion.
Relating to performance incentive funding for public institutions of higher education and to recognition of certain student achievement on degree completion.
Enacting the Kansas adult learner grant act to facilitate workforce development by providing grants and workforce retention incentive tax credits to adults who pursue baccalaureate degrees from eligible postsecondary educational institutions in certain fields of study.
Relating to measures to increase degree completion rates and support students enrolled in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics at institutions of higher education.
Relating to measures to enhance and maintain the quality of state universities, including funding and incentives to support emerging public research universities, to the abolition of the higher education fund, to the institutional groupings under the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board's accountability system, to the independent status of Lamar Institute of Technology, to research conducted by public universities and other state entities, and to the authorization of revenue bonds for certain institutions of higher education.