Texas Senate Bill SB658

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to making permanent the former temporary increases in records archive fees and records management and preservation fees charged by district and county clerks.

Impact

If enacted, SB658 will lead to a significant permanent rise in fees associated with filing suit, filing cross-actions, and management of district court records. The bill elevates the maximum allowable fees for filing various legal documents, as well as for implementing proper records techniques. This move is critical as it not only aids in supporting the preservation of court records, but it also helps in maintaining the overall safety and security of sensitive information hosted within the district and county clerk’s offices. The fees adopted must be approved as part of a county's annual budget during public meetings, ensuring transparency and local governance in implementing these increases.

Summary

Senate Bill 658 aims to make permanent the previous temporary increases in records archive fees and records management and preservation fees charged by district and county clerks throughout Texas. This legislation is intended to bolster the funding necessary for the persistence of vital administrative functions related to court records, ensuring that clerks can maintain and efficiently manage public records. Through these increases, the bill aims to enhance the infrastructure required for records management, thereby promoting better access and preservation of judicial documents.

Sentiment

Reactions to SB658 have been largely positive, particularly among those who see the necessity of funding critical governmental functions sustainably. Supporters, including local government officials and record-keeping advocates, argue that such measures are essential for effective administration of justice and maintaining the integrity of public records. However, some concerns have been raised about the burden these increased fees may place on individuals seeking legal recourse, particularly in economically disadvantaged communities. The discussions reveal a balance that needs to be struck between ensuring effective government operations and access to justice for all.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include the implications of permanently raising fees that were previously considered temporary. Critics argue that such increases may disproportionately affect lower-income individuals who might be deterred from pursuing legal actions due to higher costs. Advocates for the bill counter that maintaining an effective records management system is imperative for the legal process, and thus the fees are a necessary investment in the administration of justice. The debate highlights broader issues regarding funding for local governments and the sustainability of public services amidst fluctuating fiscal resources.