Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB85

Introduced
3/29/10  

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against the state in the suit entitled "James Paul Huddleston v. The La. Dept. of Transportation and Development, et al"

Impact

If enacted, HB 85 would directly impact the state's budget allocation, especially regarding unforeseen legal costs. The appropriation signifies the state's commitment to fulfilling its financial obligations arising from court judgments, which can reflect on the public perception of the state's legal accountability. By ensuring payment for the lawsuit, Louisiana strengthens its legal and financial standing, minimizing potential fallout from unresolved legal disputes.

Summary

House Bill 85 is a legislative proposal that seeks to appropriate funds from the state general fund of Louisiana for the fiscal year 2010-2011. The bill specifically earmarks a total of $13,500 to settle a consent judgment resulting from the case titled "James Paul Huddleston v. The Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, et al." This bill highlights the state's responsibility towards judicial outcomes and reinforces the financial implications of legal judgments against state agencies.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 85 appears to be pragmatic, focusing on the necessity of addressing legal financial obligations. Lawmakers and stakeholders likely view the bill as a straightforward measure to resolve a specific legal issue without broader political implications. Nonetheless, some may express concern regarding recurrent legal expenses stemming from state agency actions, which could lead to discussions about the need for more robust oversight or reform in state operations.

Contention

Notable points of contention might arise regarding the ongoing financial burden that legal suits impose on the state's budget. While settling lawsuits is a fiscal responsibility, some stakeholders may question the circumstances leading to such lawsuits and whether preventative measures are in place to reduce the occurrence of similar situations in the future. This bill could prompt broader discussions about the accountability of the Louisiana Department of Transportation and the management of state resources.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

LA HB1282

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the suit entitled "James D. Smith v. State of Louisiana, et al"

LA HB87

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against the Department of Transportation and Development in the suit entitled "Joseph L. LeBlanc, Jr., et al v. State of Louisiana, et al"

LA HB677

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against the State of La. in the suit entitled "Jacqueline Bonvillain v. State of La., et al."

LA HB395

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against DOTD in the suit entitled "Jeremy Waltrip, et al v. State of Louisiana, et al."

LA HB1303

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the suit entitled "Cindy Flores, et al. v. State of La., et al."

LA HB92

Appropriates funds for the payment of judgment against DOTD in the suit entitled "Patrick Robinson, et al v. Andrew M. Hintz, et al"

LA HB362

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against the State of La. in the suit entitled "Ricky Crawford, et al. v. Diamond B. Construction, et al."

LA HB1248

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the suit entitled "Perla Berdos v. State of La., et al."

LA HB326

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the suit entitled "Mitzi Allen Scott, et al. v. State of La., et al."

LA HB93

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against DOTD in the suit entitled "Robin Bergeron, et al v. State of Louisiana, et al"

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.