Louisiana House Bill HB171

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 5/25/10

Caption

(Constitutional Amendment) Prohibits introduction or consideration of nonfiscal matters during sessions convening in odd-numbered years

Impact

If enacted, HB 171 would amend Article III, Section 2(A)(3)(c) of the Louisiana Constitution, instituting standardized limits on the legislative process and thereby influencing the overall legislative atmosphere in the state. This change aims to streamline legislative sessions by preventing overcrowding of bills and ensuring that priority measures are addressed. Critics may argue that such limitations could hamper constituents' representation if lawmakers find themselves unable to address all necessary issues.

Summary

House Bill 171 is a proposed constitutional amendment that seeks to limit the number of matters a legislator can introduce during regular sessions convening in even-numbered years to ten. This proposed amendment is aimed at maintaining an organized legislative process by preventing the introduction of excessive legislation at any one time. Importantly, the bill outlines exceptions for specific appropriations bills, ensuring that key financial and operational bills can still be introduced without restriction, thus preserving necessary funding mechanisms for the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB 171 appears mixed. Proponents of the bill argue that it fosters discipline and control within legislative sessions, potentially leading to more focused discussions and decision-making. Conversely, opponents worry that changes might limit opportunities for legislators to advocate for a broader array of issues, especially those pertinent to their constituents. This represents a classic conflict between the need for efficiency in government operations and the democratic representation of diverse interests within the legislature.

Contention

The central point of contention surrounding HB 171 lies in whether the proposed limits on bill introductions will effectively enhance or undermine the legislative process. While supporters claim it will simplify legislative operations, detractors raise concerns about the implications for local and specific legislation that may arise throughout the legislative session. The discourse reflects a deeper debate about balance within government: ensuring an efficient process without sacrificing the representation of multifaceted concerns within a diverse state.