Includes students educated in secure facilities under the jurisdiction of the office of juvenile justice in the MFP
Impact
The implementation of HB 970 will enhance educational services provided to adjudicated youth and those in need of services. It aims to ensure that these students are not excluded from the state’s educational funding framework, thereby potentially improving their learning conditions and outcomes. By mandating the allocation of both state and local funding to the OJJ, the bill seeks to create a more equitable system for educating children in secure care settings, ultimately striving to reduce educational disparities faced by these vulnerable populations.
Summary
House Bill 970, proposed by Representative Simon, seeks to include students educated in secure facilities under the jurisdiction of the Office of Juvenile Justice (OJJ) in the Minimum Foundation Program (MFP). This legislative measure recognizes alternative schools located within secure care facilities as public schools, thus ensuring that students enrolled in these facilities receive adequate funding through the MFP. The bill stipulates that each student in such facilities shall be fully funded based on the local school system’s per pupil allocation that they would have received if they were in the standard public school system.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 970 appears to be largely positive among advocates for juvenile justice reform and education. Supporters highlight the importance of providing educational opportunities to all students, regardless of their circumstances, emphasizing that this inclusion could lead to better rehabilitation outcomes. However, the implementation of such funding measures may raise questions regarding the prioritization of educational resources and whether existing educational funding models adequately address the needs of traditional public schools versus those of alternative establishments.
Contention
While the bill is positioned to improve educational services for a critical demographic, there may be contention around the financial implications for local school districts. Concerns could arise regarding the equitable distribution of MFP funds and whether local systems can sustain the financial burden of transferring funds to the OJJ without negatively impacting their own resources. Some stakeholders might argue that focusing on educational provisions for adjudicated youth diverts necessary attention and resources away from mainstream educational environments, thus fostering a debate on the best approach to juvenile educational needs.
Prohibits inclusion of performance data related to students educated in office of juvenile residential centers, justice detention centers, or office of juvenile justice facilities in the school or district performance scores of the public school system where such centers or facilities are located. (8/15/10)
Requests the Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections to study laws and policies relative to benefits, including sick leave, for teachers at facilities under the jurisdiction of the office of juvenile justice who are injured or disabled as a result of assault or battery while acting in their official capacity
Provides for legislative approval of adjustments to the Minimum Foundation Program (MFP) formula adopted by the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education on October 14, 2020 (Item #4) (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)
Requires BESE to transfer MFP funds to entities providing instruction to certain students preparing to take the General Education Development test. (8/1/12)