Louisiana House Bill HCR243

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/9/10
• Refer: 6/9/10
• Refer: 6/11/10
• Refer: 6/14/10
• Engrossed: 6/15/10
• Report Pass: 6/17/10
• Passed: 6/21/10

Caption

Provides legislative approval of the MFP formula for FY 10-11 adopted by BESE on June 8, 2010

Impact

The resolution ensures that Louisiana's education funding system aligns with constitutional requirements for equitable distribution based on student needs. It emphasizes significant state general fund revenues and aims to support local school systems while promoting accountability and performance-based measures. The formula is designed to guarantee that local systems can meet foundational educational costs while addressing variables such as student demographics, particularly at-risk students and those needing special education services. This legislative approval plays a crucial role in funding for the upcoming fiscal year, emphasizing the state’s ongoing commitment to education.

Summary

HCR243 is a House Concurrent Resolution that seeks legislative approval for a formula developed by the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) to determine the cost of a Minimum Foundation Program (MFP) for public elementary and secondary schools in Louisiana. This formula, adopted on June 8, 2010, aims to provide an equitable allocation of funds to city, parish, and other local public school systems. The resolution outlines specific goals for the MFP, including equity in treatment for students, adequacy in educational programming, and local choice in budget and tax levies.

Sentiment

Support for HCR243 is generally rooted in the belief that an equitable funding system is essential for fair access to quality education across Louisiana. Advocates for the resolution celebrate its reinforcement of financial accountability and improved learning outcomes for students. However, there may be concerns regarding the adequacy of funding levels, dependence on local tax resources, and how effectively the formula will address the diverse needs of individual school systems. The overall sentiment reflects a balancing act between local control and state oversight of educational funding.

Contention

While the resolution aims for greater equity and adequacy in funding, potential points of contention include the effectiveness of the formula in addressing the needs of underfunded school districts and ensuring that all students receive adequate educational opportunities. Critics may worry that reliance on local revenues could perpetuate disparities between wealthier and less affluent districts, calling into question the long-term viability of the funding system. Ensuring compliance with both state and federal guidelines while maintaining educational standards across diverse communities remains a critical point of discussion.