Allows members of a water district board to receive per diem
Impact
The enactment of HB 1166 may significantly impact the financial operations of sewage and water districts across the state. By enabling per diem payments, this bill positions these districts to recognize and formalize the involvement of board members, potentially enhancing board engagement and accountability. However, it also imposes a restriction in the form of the need for a two-thirds vote for approval, which may vary the compensation landscape depending on the level of support within the individual boards.
Summary
House Bill 1166 proposes to authorize board members of sewage and water districts to receive per diem compensation for their service. Specifically, the bill allows the governing authority of a sewerage and water district to fix the per diem amount, contingent upon a two-thirds vote from the board's total membership. The per diem compensation is capped at $75 per day and is limited to 36 days of attendance per board member annually. These payments will be drawn from the district's funds, ensuring that members are compensated for their actual participation in board duties.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding HB 1166 appears to be supportive, as the provision for per diem is likely viewed favorably by board members who contribute their time and effort to public service without financial compensation. Advocates may see this bill as a step towards acknowledging the essential roles that these members play in their communities. However, there may be concerns from fiscal conservatives about the potential for increased spending within water district budgets, especially if boards frequently invoke the maximum allowed per diem payments.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise around the necessity and appropriateness of per diem payments for board members. Some critics may argue that public funds should not be used to compensate individuals serving on boards, while proponents of the bill may counter that fair compensation can improve board participation and ensure that members are more invested in their responsibilities. Furthermore, discussions could also highlight concerns regarding the operational transparency of how and when such per diem payments are granted, as well as discussions around the potential for mismanagement of public funds within these districts.
Provides relative to the per diem paid to members of the board of commissioners of waterworks districts located in certain parishes (EN INCREASE LF EX See Note)