Louisiana Senate Bill SB629

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 4/19/10
• Engrossed: 4/21/10
• Refer: 4/22/10

Caption

Removes reciprocity provision allowing nonresident full-time students to purchase hunting and fishing licenses at resident rates. (8/15/10) (EG SEE FISC NOTE SD RV See Note)

Impact

The removal of the reciprocity provision could lead to higher costs for nonresident full-time students wishing to participate in hunting and fishing activities in Louisiana. Previously, students benefited from essentially being treated as residents for licensing purposes, which made outdoor activities more accessible. With the new legislation, these students will likely have to pay higher nonresident rates, which could deter them from engaging in these activities and affect participation rates among young and college-aged nonresidents.

Summary

Senate Bill 629 seeks to amend the current provisions relating to hunting and fishing licenses for nonresident full-time students enrolled in accredited colleges or universities within Louisiana. The bill proposes the removal of the reciprocity provision which currently allows these students to purchase hunting and fishing licenses at the same rate as Louisiana residents, provided that their home state offers similar provisions for Louisiana residents studying there. This legislation aims to change the existing law by ending this reciprocal arrangement, thereby impacting nonresident students who study in Louisiana but are from states that do not provide such licensing benefits to Louisiana students.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB629 is likely to be mixed. Supporters may argue that the bill is a fair policy choice that addresses issues related to the regulation of hunting and fishing licenses, ensuring that only state residents receive the reduced rates while potentially increasing revenue for state wildlife programs. Conversely, opponents may express this change as a punitive measure against nonresident students, possibly increasing the financial burdens on those who are already contributing to the state through tuition and taxes, fostering a sense of discontent among out-of-state students.

Contention

Notable points of contention will revolve around equity for students: whether it is just to impose additional costs on nonresident students who are already financially challenged. Advocates for students’ rights may rally against the bill, emphasizing the need for inclusive policies that recognize the contributions of students to local economies. This proposed change highlights broader discussions about state residency rights and how they apply to educational populations.