Louisiana Senate Bill SB713

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/19/10
• Refer: 4/19/10
• Report Pass: 4/26/10
• Engrossed: 4/28/10
• Refer: 4/29/10
• Report Pass: 5/25/10
• Enrolled: 6/14/10
• Chaptered: 6/22/10
• Passed: 6/22/10

Caption

Provides limitation of liability for LAICU and member institutions if confidential student information they submit to the Board of Regents is breached as the result of board actions. (8/15/10)

Impact

The enactment of SB713 will have a significant impact on the state's educational institutions, particularly nonpublic colleges and universities, which often handle sensitive student information. By mitigating liability in situations where breaches occur due to actions taken by state entities, the bill fosters an environment where institutions can share necessary information with the state without fear of litigation. This could enhance the collaboration between educational institutions and the Board of Regents, potentially leading to improved educational data management and oversight.

Summary

Senate Bill 713 aims to provide a limitation of liability for nonpublic postsecondary educational institutions when they submit confidential student data to the Board of Regents in Louisiana. Specifically, the bill ensures that if such data is breached due to actions taken by the Board of Regents or its staff, the Louisiana Association of Independent Colleges and Universities (LAICU) and its member institutions cannot be held liable. This legislative measure seeks to protect these institutions from potential legal repercussions stemming from data breaches that are beyond their control.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB713 appears to be generally positive among educational institutions that face the burdens of legal risks associated with data breaches. Proponents argue that the bill will provide necessary legal protections, allowing educational institutions to operate more securely. However, there may be concerns raised by privacy advocates who question the adequacy of protections for student data and the implications of limiting liability in cases of negligence or mishandling of student information by state officials.

Contention

Notable points of contention might arise regarding the balance between protecting educational institutions and ensuring robust safeguards for student privacy. Critics might argue that limiting liability could lead to a lack of accountability for the Board of Regents or diminish the importance of maintaining stringent data protection protocols. As institutions navigate the complexities of data management, the need for transparency and accountability in how student information is handled remains a crucial topic for discussion.