Connecticut Senate Bill SB00350

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/5/12
• Refer: 3/5/12
• Report Pass: 3/23/12
• Refer: 4/4/12
• Report Pass: 4/11/12
• Engrossed: 4/18/12
• Report Pass: 4/20/12
• Chaptered: 5/11/12
• Enrolled: 5/18/12
• Passed: 5/31/12

Caption

An Act Requiring The Establishment Of Manufacturer Mercury Thermostat Collection And Recycling Programs.

Impact

The legislation mandates that manufacturers develop and manage these recycling programs, which entails providing collection containers to wholesalers, retailers, and contractors at no cost. Manufacturers are also charged with the responsibility of conducting educational outreach to inform the public about the risks associated with mercury thermostats and the importance of their proper disposal. Violations of the program could lead to manufacturers, wholesalers, or contractors facing restrictions on selling or distributing thermostats within the state, thereby enforcing compliance.

Summary

Senate Bill 350 establishes a mandatory program for the collection and recycling of mercury thermostats. The bill requires manufacturers of mercury thermostats to create programs that will facilitate the collection of these devices at designated sites throughout the state. By introducing a structured system to manage out-of-service mercury thermostats, the bill aims to mitigate the environmental hazards posed by mercury, a toxic substance known for its harmful effects on public health and the environment.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding SB 350 has been predominantly positive, especially among environmental advocacy groups that see the bill as a necessary step in reducing toxic waste and promoting public health. However, some stakeholders, particularly in the manufacturing and retail sectors, have expressed concerns about the costs associated with compliance and the administrative burden of managing the recycling programs.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the degree of regulatory oversight and the financial implications for manufacturers in establishing and maintaining the recycling systems. Critics have voiced that the burden of compliance may disproportionately affect smaller manufacturers who may find it challenging to comply with the new requirements without incurring significant costs. The bill’s requirements for annual reporting to the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection and the stipulations surrounding proper disposal methods also raised concerns about practicality and enforcement capabilities.