Louisiana House Bill HB1005

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/20/12
• Refer: 3/21/12

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Don Daniels, et al v. State of La., through the La. Dept. of Transportation and Development"

Impact

The passing of HB 1005 is crucial for the resolution of the specified legal matter, effectively requiring state funds to be utilized for compliance with the court's decision. Such appropriations are generally routine in state governance to manage financial liabilities arising from judicial outcomes. This bill reflects the legislative responsibility to honor legal judgments and maintain the integrity of state operations, particularly in terms of financial accountability and adherence to judicial rulings.

Summary

House Bill 1005 appropriates funds from the General Fund of the state of Louisiana for the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 specifically to cover a consent judgment in the case 'Don Daniels, et al v. State of Louisiana, through the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development'. The bill allocates a total of $30,000 for this payment, ensuring that the state's financial obligations stemming from this legal ruling are met in a timely manner.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1005 appears to be largely procedural and non-contentious, focusing on ensuring that state governance meets its legal commitments. Given that this bill deals primarily with an appropriation for a specific legal judgment rather than broader policy changes, it has not generated significant public or legislative debate. As a result, there is a general sense of agreement regarding the necessity of the bill's provisions.

Contention

While HB 1005 does not seem to face notable contention, it is worth mentioning that appropriations for judicial payments can be sensitive in nature, especially if they represent negligence or disputes involving state agencies. The bill's straightforward nature means that any points of contention would likely be procedural or administrative rather than reflective of broader ideological divides. Nonetheless, debates around state funding and accountability may surface intermittently during discussions related to such appropriations.