Louisiana House Bill HB273

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/13
• Refer: 4/8/13
• Report Pass: 4/11/13
• Engrossed: 4/18/13
• Refer: 4/22/13

Caption

Provides relative to reports, records, and adjudicatory functions of the La. State Board of Medical Examiners

Impact

The proposed changes in HB 273 will significantly alter the function and governance of the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners. By enforcing stricter requirements on quorum for decisions and clarifying the conditions under which the board may act, the bill seeks to enhance accountability and oversight within medical licensing and adjudication processes. Furthermore, the establishment of protocols for handling confidential medical information is designed to protect patient privacy while allowing the board to operate effectively on complaints regarding medical practitioners.

Summary

House Bill 273 aims to amend various provisions concerning the operations of the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners. This bill revises the quorum requirements for board action, which would now necessitate the participation of at least four members for official decisions. Additionally, the bill modifies how medical records and complaints are managed within the board, focusing on confidentiality and the destruction of records related to unresolved complaints after five years. It includes measures for ensuring that adjudicatory processes remain robust and transparent, which has implications for how the board conducts oversight of medical practices.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 273 is mixed. Supporters argue that these amendments provide necessary reforms that will lead to a more efficient and accountable board, fostering better regulation of medical practice in Louisiana. They emphasize the importance of confidentiality in medical records while also promoting the integrity of the adjudication process. Conversely, critics express concerns about the potential for increased bureaucracy and suggest that these changes could inhibit the board's responsiveness to serious complaints, especially if the qualifications for a quorum create obstacles in decision-making.

Contention

A notable point of contention in the discussions surrounding HB 273 revolves around the changes to the quorum requirements and the handling of complaints. While supporters view these adjustments as a means to increase thoroughness and caution in the board's operations, opponents argue that the new requirements may hinder timely action on pressing issues related to medical practitioners' fitness to practice. The balance between ensuring due process and the need for prompt regulatory action remains a critical theme in the debate.