Louisiana Senate Bill SCR4

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/13
• Passed: 4/8/13
• Engrossed: 4/8/13

Caption

Invites Madame Chief Justice Bernette Johnson of the Louisiana Supreme Court to address a joint session of the legislature on Tuesday, April 9, at 4:30 P.M.

Impact

SCR4 does not amend state law or create new legal frameworks; rather, it enhances communication between the legislative and judicial branches by providing a platform for the Chief Justice to share insights and perspectives regarding the judicial system and its interplay with legislative actions. This resolution may foster a greater respect and collaboration between these essential branches of government, which is crucial for the overall health of state governance.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution 4 (SCR4) was introduced to invite Madame Chief Justice Bernette Johnson of the Louisiana Supreme Court to address a joint session of the Louisiana legislature. The resolution specifies that the session is to be convened on April 9, 2013, at 4:30 P.M. This type of concurrent resolution, while not presenting law or policy changes, serves an important ceremonial and communicative function, underscoring the recognition of the judiciary's role in the state’s governance. By inviting the Chief Justice, the legislature aims to promote dialogue and understanding between the judicial and legislative branches.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR4 appears to be largely positive and respectful towards the judicial system. The invitation reflects a recognition of the importance of the judiciary and suggests a desire among lawmakers to engage constructively with judicial leaders. In the context of the legislative process, such resolutions often serve to strengthen institutional relationships and create goodwill among different branches of government.

Contention

As a concurrent resolution, SCR4 faced no opposition in the vote, reflecting a consensus about the importance of the invitation. With a unanimous vote, it indicates that legislators recognize the value of hearing from the Chief Justice. Contention might arise in different contexts; however, in this instance, the resolution exemplifies unity in acknowledging the judicial branch without igniting significant debate.