Louisiana House Bill HCR5

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/14/16
• Engrossed: 3/14/16
• Passed: 3/16/16

Caption

Invites Louisiana Supreme Court Chief Justice Bernette Joshua Johnson to address a joint session of the legislature on Tuesday, March 15, 2016, at 10:00 a.m.

Impact

While HCR5 does not directly alter state law, its resolution to convene a joint session signifies a commitment to dialogue between the legislature and judiciary. Such interactions can lead to greater understanding and cooperation on various legal matters, potentially influencing future legislative actions. The invitation also serves to reinforce the significance of the judicial branch in the governance of Louisiana, promoting transparency and accountability in the legal process.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution No. 5 (HCR5), introduced by Representative Barras, invites Chief Justice Bernette Joshua Johnson of the Louisiana Supreme Court to address a joint session of the Louisiana Legislature. This event is scheduled to take place on March 15, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., reflecting the importance of the judiciary within the legislative process and fostering collaboration between different branches of government. It highlights the legislative body's recognition of the judiciary's role in maintaining the rule of law and upholding justice in the state.

Sentiment

The reception of HCR5 appears to be largely positive, with legislators recognizing the value of engaging with the Chief Justice. This sentiment suggests an acknowledgment of the importance of the judiciary in shaping effective governance. The resolution passed unanimously in the Senate, indicating broad support from both sides of the aisle and reflecting a commitment to solidarity within the state’s governing bodies, especially in matters related to justice and legal system integrity.

Contention

There are no notable points of contention explicitly mentioned in the discussions surrounding HCR5 based on the available transcripts. The absence of opposition reflects a unifying approach to inviting judicial leadership to the legislative process, although the broader implications of judiciary-legislative relationships can occasionally raise questions about authority and the separation of powers. Future discussions may arise regarding the extent of influence that judiciary addresses may have on legislative decision-making.