Connecticut Senate Bill SJ00033

Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/24/16
• Refer: 2/24/16
• Report Pass: 3/11/16
• Refer: 3/24/16
• Report Pass: 3/31/16
• Refer: 4/26/16

Caption

Resolution Petitioning The United States Congress To Convene An Article V Constitutional Convention To Overturn The United States Supreme Court's Decision In Citizens United V. Federal Election Commission.

Impact

Should this resolution be adopted, it could set the stage for significant constitutional amendments aimed at mitigating the effects of the Citizens United ruling. By asserting the need for an Article V convention, Connecticut's legislature is positioning itself alongside other states viewing the Supreme Court's decision as damaging to the democratic process. The aim would be to create a legislative framework that restores more stringent controls on campaign contributions and independent spending in elections, which supporters believe is crucial to safeguarding the integrity of the electoral system.

Summary

SJ00033, known as the Resolution Petitioning the United States Congress to Convene an Article V Constitutional Convention, aims to challenge the United States Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The resolution articulates concerns regarding excessive political spending and its impact on democracy, arguing that such spending has led to an undue influence of affluent entities on the electoral process and, by extension, the government's functioning. The resolution calls for a constitutional convention to propose amendments that would effectively limit this influence and restore a government that is more representative of the people's interests rather than those of wealthy donors.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJ00033 appears to be largely supportive among those advocating for campaign finance reform. Many legislators and advocacy groups view the resolution as a necessary step to reclaim democracy from the grips of 'big money' in politics. Conversely, detractors may express concerns over the potential for a convention to lead to unpredictable or widespread changes in the Constitution, fearing that it could unintentionally open pathways to amendments that may not align with their values or interests.

Contention

Notable contention arises primarily around the feasibility and risks associated with convening a constitutional convention. Critics warn that while revisiting campaign finance laws is essential, the process itself could become a battleground for various unrelated amendments that could reshape the Constitution significantly. The resolution emphasizes that delegates to this convention should be selected from current elected officials, potentially ensuring that the amendments proposed are reflective of contemporary public sentiment; however, concerns linger regarding the delegation process and who ultimately shapes the narrative during such a convention.