Louisiana Senate Bill SB155

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/2/15
• Refer: 4/2/15
• Refer: 4/13/15
• Report Pass: 4/27/15
• Refer: 4/28/15
• Report Pass: 5/5/15
• Engrossed: 5/12/15
• Refer: 5/13/15
• Refer: 5/20/15
• Refer: 5/21/15
• Report Pass: 6/3/15

Caption

Constitutional amendment to authorize the postsecondary education management boards to establish tuition and fee amounts charged by institutions under their supervision and management. (2/3-CA13sl(A)) (RR INCREASE SG RV See Note)

Impact

If passed, SB 155 would significantly alter the current legislative framework governing tuition and fee increases in Louisiana. By delegating this authority to management boards, it would eliminate the necessary checks by the legislature, allowing these boards to manage funds more independently. Supporters argue this change could lead to more adaptive financial strategies at public universities, possibly enhancing funding for programs and maintaining competitive tuition rates. However, this shift may also raise concerns about unchecked authority and the potential for tuition hikes without democratic oversight.

Summary

Senate Bill 155 proposes a constitutional amendment to give postsecondary education management boards the authority to set tuition and mandatory fee amounts for the institutions they oversee without needing legislative approval. This would modify existing provisions in the Louisiana Constitution that require new fees or increases to be enacted by a two-thirds vote in the state legislature. The amendment aims to streamline the process for setting tuition and fees, potentially allowing institutions greater flexibility in responding to financial needs and trends in higher education.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 155 appears divided among various stakeholders. Proponents, primarily from educational institutions and management boards, express optimistic views on the potential for improved funding mechanisms and responsiveness to changes in the educational landscape. Conversely, critics argue that removing legislative oversight may lead to disproportionate tuition increases and undermine accountability, particularly affecting lower-income students who rely on state institutions for affordable education.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns raised about academic access and affordability. Opponents fear that without legislative oversight, boards might prioritize financial sustainability over student needs, resulting in cost burdens that could limit access to higher education. Additionally, there is skepticism about the boards' capacity to manage this new authority effectively and equitably, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in any new arrangements regarding tuition and fees.