Requires insurance for persons handling explosives. (8/1/16) (EG SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)
Impact
The implementation of SB 35 would represent a significant shift in how the state regulates explosives. It establishes a direct correlation between the ability to obtain a license for handling potentially dangerous materials and having adequate insurance coverage, which is intended to protect both the handlers and the public. This measure reflects an ongoing commitment to prioritizing safety while ensuring that those involved in such high-risk activities bear the financial responsibility for any mishaps that may occur as a result of their actions. The requirements set forth in this bill would likely lead to greater accountability and oversight within the industry.
Summary
Senate Bill 35, introduced by Senator Gatti, aims to enhance public safety by imposing stricter regulations on individuals and entities handling demilitarized explosives, propellants, and recycled bomb materials. The bill requires that anyone seeking a license for these activities must provide proof of liability insurance, with coverage set at a minimum of $50 million. This insurance must adequately cover all damages that might arise due to the handling and detonation of explosives, encompassing blast waves, fire, fragmentation, and other related risks. By introducing this requirement, the bill seeks to mitigate potential hazards associated with the use of explosives in commercial and industrial contexts.
Sentiment
Overall support for SB 35 appears strong, particularly among legislators concerned with public safety and risk management. The sentiment expressed in the discussions surrounding the bill emphasizes the necessity of such regulations in light of past incidents involving explosives. Proponents argue that the legislation not only protects residents but also ensures that those who operate within this space do so with a high degree of responsibility. However, it is also important to note that some parties may express concerns over the financial burden that the insurance requirement could impose on smaller businesses or individuals who wish to engage in these activities.
Contention
Notable points of contention regarding SB 35 may arise in discussions around the feasibility of obtaining the required insurance, particularly for smaller operators or new entrants in the explosives handling industry. While the intent behind the legislation is to enhance safety and accountability, critics may argue that such high insurance requirements could stifle competition and innovation. Further, there may be calls for clarification regarding the scope of coverage, particularly on what types of incidents are included and how claims can be processed, leading to debates about the balancing act between safety and business interests.
Provides for licensing and regulation of manufacturers, dealer-distributors, users, blasters, and handlers of explosives. (gov sig) (EN NO IMPACT See Note)