Provides relative to the Department of Transportation and Development. (8/1/16)
Impact
The bill has the potential to impact state laws significantly by removing outdated terms and clarifying the definition of 'department' which will be consistently applied throughout the statute R.S. 48. This amendment is expected to reduce confusion in legal references and facilitate a more efficient governance structure within the Department of Transportation and Development. Furthermore, the standardization in definitions may aid in ensuring that laws are interpreted uniformly in relation to transportation and infrastructure development across Louisiana.
Summary
Senate Bill 386 aims to modernize and clarify language related to the Department of Transportation and Development in Louisiana. Specifically, it addresses definitions associated with the department, particularly by eliminating outdated terms such as 'board of highways' and 'department of highways' which are no longer in use. The proposed law intends to streamline administrative references within the relevant statutes, enhancing clarity in the legal language that governs transportation and development in the state. By updating these definitions, the bill seeks to align with contemporary practices and terminologies within the state's transportation framework.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB 386 appears to be neutral, reflecting a consensus on the necessity of updating legal definitions to mirror current operational realities. Given that the changes are administrative in nature, they do not seem to evoke strong opposition or support. Legislators generally agree that such technical amendments are essential for maintaining an effective legal framework that governs state agencies.
Contention
Notable points of contention did not arise in discussions surrounding SB 386, as it primarily focuses on updates to language rather than on substantial policy changes or funding allocations. Legislative conversations indicate that the primary focus has been on the technical aspects of the bill rather than ideological divides. The straightforward nature of the legislation suggests that the amendments made by SB 386 are expected to be implemented without significant debate or contention.