Louisiana Senate Bill SB393

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/14
• Refer: 3/10/14

Caption

Provides relative to the composition, purposes, and functions of the Department of Transportation and Development. (8/1/14)

Impact

The passage of SB 393 would have several implications for state governance concerning transportation and public infrastructure. By specifying the department's duties, the bill aims to streamline operations and improve the management of transportation projects. This could lead to enhanced coordination within the department and potentially quicker response times in addressing the state's transportation needs. Furthermore, the bill retains present law while making technical revisions, ensuring that existing functions are preserved while providing clearer guidelines for future operations.

Summary

Senate Bill 393, authored by Senator Chabert, aims to clarify and update the roles and responsibilities of the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD). The bill amends certain sections of the law to define the department's composition, purposes, and functions more clearly. It emphasizes the responsibility of the department to ensure safe and efficient transportation systems and public works, with a particular focus on the development of programs for highways, airports, waterways, and mass transit. Additionally, the bill includes provisions that enhance administrative efficiency by allowing the secretary of the DOTD to propose reorganization plans to the legislature.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SB 393 appears to be supportive among legislators who prioritize improved infrastructure and organizational efficiency. Proponents argue that the bill will allow for quicker decision-making and better service delivery in transportation and public works. However, the discussions indicate that there may also be concerns regarding potential impacts on budgetary allocations and oversight, with stakeholders emphasizing the need for accountability in how transportation projects are managed.

Contention

Notable points of contention center around the authority granted to the DOTD secretary concerning administrative changes. Critics may argue that while restructuring for efficiency is necessary, it could also lead to more centralized power within the department, potentially limiting stakeholder input and local governance participation in transportation project decisions. The balance between operational efficiency and community involvement remains a significant theme in the discussions surrounding this bill.