Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB260

Introduced
3/27/19  
Introduced
3/27/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Refer
4/29/19  
Refer
4/29/19  
Refer
4/30/19  
Refer
4/30/19  
Report Pass
5/6/19  

Caption

(Constitutional Amendment) Eliminates the income tax deduction for federal income taxes paid for purposes of calculating individual and corporate income taxes and requires the levy of a flat individual income tax rate (RE NO IMPACT GF RV See Note)

Impact

If passed, this bill would reshape the landscape of income taxation in Louisiana. It eliminates a much-utilized deduction that many taxpayers currently rely on, which could increase the overall tax burden for some individuals and corporations. The move to a flat tax rate could also lead to increased predictability in tax revenues for the state, as a consistent rate could simplify calculations and compliance. However, the amendment could fundamentally alter the way the state taxes income and its implications on economic equity.

Summary

House Bill 260 proposes a significant amendment to the Louisiana state constitution that eliminates the deduction for federal income taxes when calculating state income taxes, both for individuals and corporations. Additionally, it establishes a flat individual income tax rate, which will be determined by law. The intent behind this change is to streamline and simplify the state's income tax system, making it more uniform and potentially more appealing to taxpayers as it shifts away from a graduated income tax structure.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 260 is mixed, with proponents arguing that the elimination of the federal deduction could simplify tax computation and make Louisiana's tax code more competitive. They suggest that a flat rate could be easier for taxpayers to understand and comply with, potentially stimulating economic growth. Conversely, opponents express concerns about the possible adverse effects on lower-income individuals, who may bear a disproportionate burden due to the elimination of the federal deduction. This highlights ongoing debates about tax equity and fairness in state taxation.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the fairness and effectiveness of transitioning to a flat tax system while removing federal deductions. Critics argue that it may disproportionately affect lower and middle-income earners who are more reliant on such deductions. The bill's passage would entail significant implications on revenue generation and distribution of tax burdens among different income groups. Further, the process of determining the exact flat rate and its alignment with state fiscal needs presents an important element of the ongoing discussion surrounding the amendment.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB355

Crimes: extortion.

CA AB1872

Crimes: extortion.

CA AB1993

Unemployment and disability insurance: benefits: in-home supportive services and waiver personal care services.

CA AB1043

Age verification signals: software applications and online services.

CA AB1638

Privacy.

CA SB1010

Privacy: biometric surveillance systems.

CA AB3229

California Right to Financial Privacy Act.

MI HB5571

Elections: petitions; provisions regarding ballot initiative petitions, constitutional amendment petitions, and nominating petitions; modify, and provide for the statistical random sampling of certain petition signatures. Amends secs. 482, 482a & 544c of 1954 PA 116 (MCL 168.482 et seq.).