California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1209

Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Report Pass
4/20/17  
Refer
4/20/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Engrossed
5/31/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Report Pass
7/5/17  
Refer
7/5/17  
Refer
7/5/17  
Report Pass
7/12/17  
Refer
7/13/17  
Refer
7/13/17  
Refer
8/21/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Enrolled
9/11/17  
Enrolled
9/11/17  
Vetoed
10/15/17  

Caption

Employers: gender pay differentials.

Impact

The passage of AB 1209 would result in significant changes to the Labor Code by enforcing rigorous reporting requirements on gender wage differentials. Companies that fall under its jurisdiction must proactively gather and report data stratified by job classification, which not only aims to highlight existing discrepancies but also promotes a culture of accountability among employers. This legislation may influence corporate practices concerning wage equity and incentivize businesses to revisit their pay structures to eliminate gender-based wage gaps.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1209, introduced by Assembly Member Gonzalez Fletcher, aims to address gender wage differentials in large employers within California. The legislation targets companies with 500 or more employees, mandating them to collect and report specific data on wage disparities between male and female exempt employees and board members. By requiring this data to be submitted biennially starting July 1, 2019, the bill seeks to create transparency regarding compensation practices and encourage equitable pay for similar work. The Secretary of State is tasked with publishing this information on a public website, contingent on necessary funding and established processes.

Sentiment

Sentiment around AB 1209 is largely supportive among advocacy groups focused on gender equity, who see it as a meaningful step towards addressing persistent pay inequities. However, some business organizations express concern regarding the administrative burden and challenges associated with compliance. They argue that the extensive data collection requirements might uncover wage differentials without providing context, leading to misinterpretation of the results. Thus, while the advocacy for fair pay resonates positively, opposition arises from fears that the legislation may impose undue regulatory constraints on employers.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding AB 1209 include discussions about the effectiveness of data transparency in actually reducing pay gaps, as well as concerns over privacy for employees whose wages are reported. Additionally, there are debates about whether the criteria for exemption are appropriately defined and sufficiently protect employees from discrimination or bias. Critics suggest that without additional measures accompanying the reporting requirements, such as targeted remediation strategies, the legislation may fall short of achieving its equity goals.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1655

University of California: requests from the California State Auditor’s Office: prohibition on coordination.

CA SB541

Electricity: load shifting: dynamic pricing.

CA SB1287

Public postsecondary education: Equity in Higher Education Act: prohibition on violence, harassment, intimidation, and discrimination.

CA SB66

California Council on the Future of Transportation: advisory committee: autonomous vehicle technology.

CA SB569

Political Reform Act of 1974: audits.

CA SB261

Greenhouse gases: climate-related financial risk.

CA AB1429

State agency records: Records Management Coordinator duties: personnel training.

CA AB2749

State agencies: state entities: Internet Web site accessibility: standards: mobile-friendly: requirements.