California Assembly Bill AB1429

California 2021-2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/19/21
• Refer: 3/11/21
• Report Pass: 4/29/21
• Refer: 4/29/21
• Refer: 5/19/21
• Report Pass: 5/20/21
• Engrossed: 5/27/21
• Refer: 5/28/21
• Refer: 6/9/21
• Report Pass: 6/22/21
• Refer: 6/22/21
• Report Pass: 6/29/21
• Refer: 6/29/21
• Refer: 8/23/21

Caption

State agency records: Records Management Coordinator duties: personnel training.

Impact

The enactment of AB 1429 is expected to enhance the operational efficiency of state agencies by standardizing training procedures for personnel involved in the management of public records. The bill mandates that all agency staff, aside from the Records Management Coordinator, complete a one-hour training course within 60 days of employment and follow up with regular refresher training every two years. This regulation is aimed at fostering a culture of accountability and professionalism in the management of public records across California's various state agencies.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1429, introduced by Assembly Member Holden, seeks to amend Section 12274.5 of the Government Code regarding the duties of the Records Management Coordinator within state agencies. This bill specifically emphasizes the need for effective training for agency personnel who manage public records, mandating that these individuals complete formal records management training provided by the Secretary of State. The requirement establishes a streamlined approach to ensuring all records personnel are adequately trained in best practices for record retention and management.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around AB 1429 appears to be supportive, with proponents arguing that improved training will lead to more efficient handling of public records and ultimately enhance transparency and accountability within state government. The focus on training is seen as a crucial step toward modernizing records management practices, addressing past inefficiencies and confusion in the management of state documents and information. Such positive reinforcement of professional standards is welcomed by many members of the legislature and records management professionals.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support, there could be points of contention regarding its implementation, particularly around the availability of resources for training and the potential costs associated with compliance for state agencies. Some critics might argue that the burden of additional training could strain resources, especially in smaller agencies or those with limited budgets. However, the overarching goal of promoting efficient records management and governmental accountability is viewed as a necessary investment by supporters of AB 1429.