California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1759

Introduced
3/8/23  
Introduced
3/8/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Report Pass
4/24/23  
Report Pass
4/24/23  
Refer
4/26/23  
Refer
4/26/23  
Report Pass
5/17/23  
Report Pass
5/17/23  
Engrossed
5/25/23  
Engrossed
5/25/23  
Refer
5/26/23  
Refer
5/26/23  
Refer
6/7/23  
Refer
6/7/23  
Report Pass
6/27/23  
Refer
6/27/23  
Refer
6/27/23  
Enrolled
8/17/23  
Enrolled
8/17/23  
Chaptered
9/1/23  
Chaptered
9/1/23  
Passed
9/1/23  

Caption

State archives.

Impact

The bill lays out new responsibilities for Records Management Coordinators within state agencies, requiring them to promptly inform the Secretary of State about lost or destroyed records. This provision is designed to reduce the risks associated with record loss and mismanagement, ensuring that there is more consistent oversight over public records. Furthermore, the establishment of a Document Laboratory and a Record Processing Program under the direction of the Secretary of State provides a structured approach to handling and preserving state archives, which is crucial in protecting the interests of transparency and accountability in government operations.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1759, approved on September 1, 2023, amends various sections of the California Government Code pertaining to public records management. It updates the State Records Management Act, mandating that state agencies notify the Secretary of State when records are digitized, irrespective of whether the process is conducted by a third-party vendor. This change aims to enhance transparency and accountability in how state records are managed, reflecting an evolving landscape in the management of governmental documents in a digital age.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding AB 1759 is positive, as it is perceived as a necessary legislative step to modernize public records management in California. Lawmakers supporting the bill emphasized the importance of maintaining accurate and accessible records, reflecting a commitment to accountability. However, some concerns may exist about the administrative burden on agencies tasked with complying with the new requirements, although these are generally outweighed by the benefits of improved records management.

Contention

While there seems to be broad support for the bill, the principal contention lies in the additional administrative responsibilities imposed on state agencies, particularly smaller ones that may lack the infrastructure or resources to manage these new obligations efficiently. The requirement for ongoing training and the notification process for lost records could pose challenges, but proponents assert that the long-term benefits of improved records management will outweigh these initial hurdles.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB469

State records management: records management coordinator.

CA AB1429

State agency records: Records Management Coordinator duties: personnel training.

LA SB149

Provides relative to the powers, duties, and functions of the Louisiana State Archives. (8/1/24)

CA SB202

Animal blood donors.

CA SB153

Industrial hemp.

CA SB1409

Industrial hemp.

CA SB696

Notaries public.

CA SB1115

Commercial blood banks for animals: animal blood donors.