California Assembly Bill AB1406

California 2017-2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/17/17
• Refer: 3/16/17
• Report Pass: 4/18/17
• Refer: 4/19/17
• Report Pass: 4/27/17
• Refer: 4/27/17
• Refer: 5/17/17
• Report Pass: 5/26/17
• Engrossed: 5/31/17
• Refer: 6/1/17
• Refer: 6/14/17
• Report Pass: 6/19/17
• Refer: 6/19/17
• Report Pass: 5/7/18
• Refer: 5/7/18
• Refer: 5/14/18
• Refer: 5/24/18
• Report Pass: 6/6/18
• Refer: 6/18/18
• Enrolled: 8/9/18
• Chaptered: 8/27/18
• Passed: 8/27/18

Caption

School facilities: leases of real property.

Impact

By extending the lease terms, AB 1406 potentially allows school districts to secure long-term arrangements that could facilitate continuous improvement and maintenance of school facilities. This could particularly benefit partnerships with private entities and local governments, allowing for better resource allocation and long-term financial commitments. The amendment aims to streamline operations for school districts, enabling them to foster better learning environments through improved facility management.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1406, known as AB 1406, aims to amend Sections 17403 and 17517 of the Education Code concerning school facilities and real property leases. The bill proposes to increase the maximum term for leases and agreements between school districts and other entities from the current limits of 40 and 66 years to 99 years. This change reflects an effort to provide greater stability and longer-term planning capabilities for school districts when leasing facilities and entering into agreements involving school properties.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1406 appears to be largely positive, with support primarily from education advocates and school district representatives who see the benefits of longer lease terms. The bill received a significant majority vote in its legislative passage, indicating strong bipartisan support. Proponents argue that such measures are crucial for the ongoing development and enhancement of school facilities, ultimately benefiting students and educational outcomes.

Contention

While the discussions surrounding AB 1406 have been predominantly favorable, some concerns may arise regarding the implications of long-term leases. Critics might question whether longer terms could limit flexibility in adapting to future changes in educational needs or local government regulations. However, overall, the legislative discourse suggests a consensus on the necessity of adapting lease terms to better align with the current needs of educational facilities across California.