California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1185

Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/9/17  
Refer
3/9/17  
Report Pass
3/30/17  
Report Pass
3/30/17  
Refer
4/4/17  
Report Pass
5/3/17  
Report Pass
5/3/17  
Engrossed
5/11/17  
Engrossed
5/11/17  
Refer
5/11/17  
Refer
5/24/17  
Refer
5/24/17  
Report Pass
6/12/17  
Refer
6/12/17  

Caption

Rental passenger vehicles.

Impact

The impact of AB 1185 is significant as it modifies how rental companies are permitted to inform customers about vehicle use and safety regulations. By allowing electronic signs and changing the conditions under which companies can access rental usage information obtained through electronic surveillance, the bill aims to make rental processes more efficient. This includes adjusting the time frame for tracking unpaid rentals, decreasing it from one week to three days, which could enhance vehicle recovery efforts for rental companies.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1185, introduced by Assembly Member O'Donnell, seeks to amend existing laws governing rental passenger vehicles in California. The bill notably allows rental car companies to utilize electronic signage for mandatory disclosures related to vehicle rentals and child safety restraint systems. It seeks to modernize communication methods while still ensuring compliance with safety standards, thereby enhancing the convenience for customers. This change aims to make crucial safety and liability information more accessible to renters without compromising the rights and obligations already established under existing laws.

Sentiment

Sentiment around AB 1185 appears to be generally positive, particularly from pro-business factions who believe that modernizing communication and compliance requirements will streamline operations for rental companies. However, some consumer advocacy groups may express concern regarding how these changes could potentially infringe upon privacy and customer rights, especially with increased reliance on electronic monitoring capabilities.

Contention

Noteworthy points of contention include the potential overreach of electronic surveillance provisions, which allow companies to monitor rental usage after a shorter period without returning a vehicle. Critics may argue this could lead to excessive tracking and infringement on personal privacy. The debate surrounding the adequacy of customer protections in the face of such technological advancements is vital, as it pits modern operational needs against consumer rights and safety considerations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2741

Rental car companies: electronic surveillance technology.

CA AB1222

Rental passenger vehicles: additional mandatory charges.

CA AB3244

Rental passenger vehicle transactions.

CA AB893

Personal vehicle sharing programs.

CA AB1756

Committee on Judiciary: judiciary omnibus.

CA AB822

Vehicles: removal and impoundment.

CA AB645

Vehicles: speed safety system pilot program.

CA AB3085

Vehicles: removal and impoundment.

CA AB2780

Carrier of Passengers Act of 2024.

CA AB637

Zero-emission vehicles: fleet owners: rental vehicles.

Similar Bills

CA AB326

Electric mobility manufacturers.

CA AB1197

Rental passenger vehicles: electronic surveillance technology: renter liability for loss due to theft.

CA AB2658

Secretary of the Government Operations Agency: working group: blockchain technology.

CA AB1211

Electric mobility manufacturers.

CA AB2741

Rental car companies: electronic surveillance technology.

CA SB1445

Electric mobility manufacturers.

ND SB2070

The rights of health care facility residents.

CA AB391

Leased and rented vehicles: embezzlement and theft.