Connecticut House Bill HJ00032

Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/22/21
• Refer: 1/22/21

Caption

Resolution Proposing A State Constitutional Amendment Concerning The Term Of Office Of Members Of The General Assembly.

Impact

By increasing the term length, HJ00032 could have profound implications on state governance and the legislative landscape. Proponents argue that this change would enable legislators to engage in long-term planning and policy development without the constant pressure of re-election every two years. This could potentially lead to more comprehensive and effective governance. Conversely, the bill includes provisions that would limit assembly members to two consecutive four-year terms. This aims to strike a balance between allowing longer service while preventing the entrenchment of political power, thus addressing concerns about accountability and representation.

Summary

HJ00032 proposes a significant change to the state constitution by amending sections 8 and 10 of article three. The bill seeks to extend the term of office for members of the General Assembly, including both state representatives and state senators, from the current two years to four years. The aim of this amendment is to align the term lengths of lawmakers with a belief that longer terms may enhance stability and continuity in the legislative process, thereby allowing members to focus on governance rather than frequent re-election campaigns.

Contention

The proposed changes are likely to generate debate regarding the balance between stability and accountability in government. Supporters may contend that longer terms empower legislators to implement meaningful change without the distraction of frequent elections. However, opponents might argue that extending terms could reduce electoral accountability, making it harder for voters to express dissatisfaction with their representatives. Furthermore, limiting legislators to two terms could be viewed as both a safeguard against career politicians and a means of ensuring fresh perspectives in governance, yet it could also hinder the depth of experience within the General Assembly over time.