Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06587

Introduced
3/4/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Report Pass
3/22/21  
Report Pass
3/22/21  
Refer
3/31/21  
Refer
3/31/21  
Report Pass
4/7/21  
Engrossed
6/4/21  
Engrossed
6/4/21  
Report Pass
6/5/21  

Caption

An Act Concerning Health Insurance Coverage For Epinephrine Cartridge Injectors, Health Carriers, Pharmacy Benefits Managers And The Cost Impact Of Certain Mandated Health Insurance Benefits.

Impact

The implementation of HB 6587 is expected to significantly impact existing state health laws by ensuring that patients requiring epinephrine injectors are financially protected from high out-of-pocket expenses. By limiting co-payments, the bill aims to facilitate wider access to necessary medications and address public health concerns related to anaphylaxis. As such, the bill underscores the state's commitment to improve health outcomes for individuals with severe allergies, aligning health insurance practices with best practices in allergy management.

Summary

House Bill 6587 is focused on improving health insurance coverage for epinephrine cartridge injectors, which are crucial for individuals at risk of severe allergic reactions (anaphylaxis). The legislation mandates that all individual and group health insurance policies that cover outpatient prescription drugs must also provide coverage specifically for these injectors starting January 1, 2022. Furthermore, the bill restricts the out-of-pocket cost for obtaining an epinephrine injector to a maximum of $25, thereby making it more accessible for patients who require it for emergency situations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6587 is predominantly positive, with support coming from various stakeholders including health advocates, allergy specialists, and patient advocacy groups. Supporters argue that this legislation is a critical step in safeguarding public health and improving the quality of life for those living with severe allergies. However, there are concerns from some insurance providers regarding the potential financial implications of mandated coverage on their business models.

Contention

Notable points of contention arose around the implications of the bill for insurance companies, who may have argued that mandated coverage could lead to increased premiums or reduced options for consumers overall. However, proponents emphasize the importance of ensuring that all individuals have timely access to life-saving medications without the barrier of excessive costs. This balancing act—between accessible healthcare and the economic sustainability of insurance providers—remained a focal point during discussions about the bill's passage.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT SB00331

An Act Concerning State Marshals' Health Benefits.

CT HB05460

An Act Concerning Health Insurance Coverage For Ambulance Services.

CT HB05503

An Act Concerning Insurance Market Conduct And Insurance Licensing, The Insurance Department's Technical Corrections And Other Revisions To The Insurance Statutes And Captive Insurance.

CT HB05378

An Act Concerning Health Insurance Coverage For The Diagnosis And Treatment Of Infertility.

CT SB00341

An Act Establishing A Fallen Officer Fund And Providing Health Insurance Coverage To Survivors Of A Police Officer Killed In The Line Of Duty.

CT HB05377

An Act Concerning The Connecticut Health Insurance Exchange.

CT SB00404

An Act Concerning Affordability As A Factor In Premium Rate Filings For Individual And Group Health Insurance Policies.

CT HB05488

An Act Concerning Various Revisions To The Public Health Statutes.

CT SB00001

An Act Concerning The Health And Safety Of Connecticut Residents.

CT HB05247

An Act Concerning Employee Health Benefit Consortiums.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.