Alabama Senate Bill SB263

Alabama 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/2/24
• Report Pass: 4/9/24
• Refer: 4/2/24
• Engrossed: 4/23/24
• Report Pass: 4/25/24
• Refer: 4/23/24
• Enrolled: 5/2/24
• Passed: 5/9/24

Caption

Etowah County, provides for service of process

Impact

The legislation introduces a service of process fee set at thirty-five dollars ($35) for each party requiring personal service by the sheriff. This fee is intended to bolster the Sheriff’s Law Enforcement Fund, providing financial resources that the sheriff can use at his discretion for lawful purposes. Importantly, the bill also reinforces existing funding structures, making it clear that this fee will not replace other sources of income for the sheriff's office. The act is contingent upon the ratification of an amendment to the Alabama Constitution, which allows the Legislature to regulate court costs specifically for Etowah County.

Summary

SB263 is a legislative act that focuses on the procedural framework for service of process in Etowah County, Alabama. The bill grants the Sheriff of Etowah County the authority to contract with various entities to facilitate the service of legal documents, excluding arrest warrants. This provision aims to streamline the process and potentially increase efficiency in how such services are delivered within the county.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB263 appears supportive, particularly from local legislative bodies that see the bill as a means to enhance law enforcement activities and improve the service of process within the county. The approval of the bill with a unanimous vote (14 in favor and 0 against) during the last session reflects this positive inclination. However, the requirement for constitutional ratification may introduce some level of cautious optimism as stakeholders await the amendment's approval.

Contention

While the bill has been largely supported, some contention may arise concerning the establishment of the fee and how it will impact individuals and entities needing service of process. There may be concerns about the increased financial burden on litigants or parties involved in legal matters, raising questions about access to justice. Additionally, the centralized authority granted to the sheriff regarding fee collection might lead to discussions around transparency and accountability relating to the usage of the generated funds.