Louisiana House Bill HR74

Louisiana 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/10/21
• Refer: 5/11/21
• Report Pass: 5/26/21
• Passed: 6/2/21

Caption

Establishes the Louisiana Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Innovation Caucus

Impact

The formation of the STEM Innovation Caucus is expected to provide a unified platform for legislators to collectively address the needs and opportunities related to STEM education and innovation in Louisiana. By recognizing the importance of biosciences and other STEM sectors, which contribute significantly to job creation and economic development, the caucus underscores the state's commitment to enhancing its position in science and technology. Although the caucus will operate without funding or dedicated resources from the state, its establishment may inspire legislative initiatives aimed at improving STEM-related educational programs and industry partnerships.

Summary

House Resolution 74 (HR74) establishes the Louisiana Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Innovation Caucus within the House of Representatives. The primary objective of the caucus is to foster legislative support for STEM research and entrepreneurial initiatives. This caucus aims to bring together members who are passionate about promoting STEM fields in Louisiana, facilitating coordination and advocacy for policies enhancing growth in these critical sectors.

Sentiment

The sentiment around the bill appears to be positive, particularly among lawmakers who recognize the potential impact of increased focus on STEM education and innovation. The creation of this caucus is generally viewed as a proactive step toward addressing the workforce demands of the future, particularly in high-growth fields. However, there may be concerns about the caucus's effectiveness without allocated funding, as noted by its provision that it will not receive any financial or logistical support from the House.

Contention

While the establishment of the STEM Innovation Caucus is largely seen as beneficial, there may arise contention regarding the lack of resources provided to support its mission. Critics could argue that without funding, the caucus may struggle to make a tangible impact on STEM policy and education in Louisiana. The debate may also center on how effectively the caucus can advocate for necessary changes and support in a climate where funding for education and innovation programs is often limited.