California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1379

Introduced
2/19/21  
Introduced
2/19/21  
Refer
3/11/21  
Refer
3/11/21  
Report Pass
3/22/21  
Report Pass
3/22/21  
Refer
3/23/21  
Report Pass
4/12/21  
Report Pass
4/12/21  
Refer
4/13/21  
Refer
4/13/21  
Failed
2/1/22  

Caption

Online platforms: disclosures.

Impact

The implications of AB 1379 are significant for state laws governing online communication and electoral processes. By imposing civil penalties for violations, the bill introduces a framework for accountability among online platforms, ensuring that they cannot amplify misleading content without repercussions. This is particularly relevant for political campaigns, where misinformation can significantly sway public opinion. Moreover, it extends the existing regulations under the Political Reform Act, which governs campaign financing and activities, further integrating online platforms into the regulatory environment surrounding elections.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1379, introduced by Assembly Member Eduardo Garcia, aims to address the issue of false campaign speech in the digital age, particularly relating to social media platforms. This bill seeks to prohibit social media platforms from amplifying content that violates its terms of service, especially in the context of electoral campaigns. By mandating online platforms to provide users with tools to report misleading posts and requiring transparency in political advertising practices, the bill intends to create a more accountable environment for information dissemination online.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 1379 appears to be mixed, reflecting a growing concern over misinformation in political discourse. Advocates of the bill argue that it is a necessary measure to safeguard electoral integrity and protect voters from false information that could mislead them during elections. Conversely, critics may view it as a potential overreach that could stifle free speech and impose undue restrictions on online communication, particularly for smaller platforms that may struggle with compliance.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding AB 1379 include the balance between regulating misinformation and protecting First Amendment rights. Some stakeholders may argue that enforcing strict penalties could lead to censorship, while others may deem it essential for ensuring fair political processes. Additionally, the bill raises questions about the responsibilities of large online platforms versus smaller ones regarding compliance with transparency requirements and the ability of less known platforms to adequately enforce or manage content moderation effectively.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2655

Defending Democracy from Deepfake Deception Act of 2024.

CA SB764

Minors: online platforms.

CA AB2839

Elections: deceptive media in advertisements.

CA SB1228

User identity authentication.

CA SB678

Elections: disclosures.

CA AB502

Food delivery platforms: disclosure.

CA AB306

Office of Small Business Advocate: one-stop capital shop online platform.

CA AB1027

Social media platforms: drug safety policies.

CA SB248

Political Reform Act of 1974: disclosures: candidate experience.

CA AB375

Food delivery platforms: disclosure of delivery drivers’ identity.

Similar Bills

CA AB2885

False campaign speech and online platform disclosures.

CA SB921

Political Reform Act of 1974: digital political advertisements.

CA AB868

Political Reform Act of 1974: digital political advertisements.

CA AB1798

Campaign disclosure: advertisements.

CA AB2188

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign disclosures: advertisements.

CA AB1217

Political Reform Act of 1974: electioneering and issue lobbying communications: disclosures.

CA AB864

Political Reform Act of 1974: disclosures.