Us Congress House Bill HJR46

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/30/23
• Refer: 3/30/23
• Refer: 4/14/23
• Report Pass: 4/28/23

Caption

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Marine Fisheries Service relating to "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and Designating Critical Habitat".

Impact

The passage of HJR46 would invalidate the regulatory framework established by the previously mentioned rule, leading to potential alterations in how endangered and threatened species are managed. This would mean less governmental oversight regarding the listing and protection of these species, possibly allowing for more flexibility in land use and development that could affect their habitats. The implications of this change could significantly influence conservation strategies and wildlife management practices across the country.

Summary

HJR46 is a joint resolution that seeks to disapprove a rule submitted by the National Marine Fisheries Service concerning the regulations for listing endangered and threatened species and designating critical habitats. This bill directly addresses regulations that were previously put in place to manage and protect wildlife populations classified as endangered or threatened. By disapproving this rule, HJR46 aims to eliminate federal regulations which these sponsors argue may be unnecessarily restrictive or cumbersome for land and resource management.

Sentiment

Discussion surrounding HJR46 reflects a deeply divided sentiment regarding environmental protections and regulatory frameworks. Supporters of HJR46, including several Republican lawmakers, express the belief that federal regulations can be overly burdensome and stifle economic opportunities. Conversely, environmentalists and many Democratic legislators argue that the bill undermines critical protections necessary for the survival of vulnerable species, portraying it as a rollback of crucial conservation efforts.

Contention

Notable contention arises from the fundamental disagreement over the balance between economic development and environmental protection. Critics of HJR46 fear that disapproval of the regulation could lead to increased habitat destruction and negative impacts on biodiversity. This conflict highlights ongoing tensions between economic interests and environmental advocacy, raising questions about how best to manage natural resources in a way that fosters both economic growth and ecological sustainability.