Us Congress House Bill HJR199

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 8/2/24
• Refer: 8/2/24

Caption

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration relating to "Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks for Model Years 2027 and Beyond and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Heavy-Duty Pickup Trucks and Vans for Model Years 2030 and Beyond".

Impact

The impact of HJR199, if passed, is significant, as it challenges the regulatory authority of the NHTSA and could set a precedent regarding federal environmental standards. The disapproval of the proposed fuel efficiency standards might lead to a further reliance on fossil fuels and could hinder progress in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector. Proponents of the resolution argue that these regulations impose excessive burdens on manufacturers and consumers, potentially leading to increased vehicle costs and negative economic implications for the auto industry.

Summary

HJR199 is a joint resolution aimed at disapproving a rule proposed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) related to Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for passenger vehicles and fuel efficiency standards for heavy-duty trucks. If HJR199 is enacted, it will effectively nullify the enforcement of these standards starting from model year 2027 for passenger cars and light trucks, and from model year 2030 for heavy-duty pickup trucks and vans. This resolution comes in response to regulatory developments intended to enhance fuel economy and reduce emissions from the automobile sector.

Contention

Notably, HJR199 has generated contention among lawmakers and advocacy groups, reflecting broader debates around environmental policy and economic considerations. Supporters of the disapproval assert that the stringent CAFE standards undermine consumer choice and could force manufacturers to focus on meeting regulatory metrics at the expense of performance and affordability. On the other hand, opponents criticize the resolution as a retreat from necessary environmental protections that aim to address climate change and public health concerns associated with air quality. The dialogue surrounding this bill encapsulates a key divide in contemporary policy debates regarding the balance between economic growth and environmental stewardship.