Us Congress House Bill HJR196

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 8/2/24
• Refer: 8/2/24

Caption

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Defense relating to "Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Architect and Engineering Service Fees (DFARS Case 2024-D019)".

Impact

If HJR196 is passed, it would directly impact the procedures related to how the Department of Defense establishes fees for architect and engineering services. By disapproving this rule, Congress would be signaling its discontent with the Department's approach, which may prompt further adjustments or a reconsideration of how such fees are determined. The resolution reflects a broader legislative intent to maintain oversight and ensure that federal regulations align with congressional priorities, particularly those that concern fiscal implications and the structuring of contracts within the defense sector.

Summary

HJR196 is a joint resolution introduced in the 118th Congress aimed at providing congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Department of Defense. The rule in question relates to the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement concerning architect and engineering service fees. The resolution calls for this rule to have no force or effect, effectively allowing Congress to prevent the implementation of the regulation by invoking its authority under chapter 8 of title 5 of the United States Code. This action underscores Congress's role in overseeing and possibly countering executive regulatory actions that it deems unnecessary or burdensome.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HJR196 likely stem from differing perspectives on federal regulation authority. Supporters of the disapproval may argue that the existing rule presents an unnecessary financial burden on contractors or may lack sufficient justification. Conversely, advocates of the Department's original rule may contend that these fees are necessary to maintain quality and standards within defense contracts. The resolution serves as a battleground for these differing philosophies regarding the balance of power between Congress and federal agencies regarding regulatory oversight.