Oklahoma Senate Bill SB1047

Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/11/21
• Refer: 2/18/21
• Report Pass: 5/17/21
• Engrossed: 5/18/21
• Enrolled: 5/20/21
• Passed: 5/24/21

Caption

Department of Mental Health; requiring certain funds be used for certain purposes.

Impact

The enactment of SB 1047 is expected to bolster state laws regarding mental health services, specifically targeting the integration of mental health support within community responses, particularly in law enforcement contexts. It emphasizes the creation of pilot programs and the enhancement of crisis intervention training, which could lead to more effective management of mental health crises. This bill could significantly influence how mental health issues are addressed by law enforcement and social services in Oklahoma, potentially improving outcomes for individuals in crisis situations.

Summary

Senate Bill 1047 addresses the need for enhanced mental health and substance abuse services in Oklahoma. It mandates the allocation of specific funds from previously appropriated budgets, aiming to improve program growth and support various initiatives related to mental health. The bill outlines that approximately $7.5 million is earmarked for expanding mental health crisis centers and training for law enforcement officers in crisis intervention techniques, reflecting a comprehensive approach to mental healthcare in the state.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding SB 1047 appears to be supportive, particularly among mental health advocates and lawmakers focused on public health. Supporters view the bill as a necessary step toward providing better resources and coordination between mental health services and law enforcement. However, apprehensions may exist regarding the sufficiency of funding and the effectiveness of implemented programs, especially in addressing the widespread opioid crisis and ensuring comprehensive mental health care across rural and underserved communities.

Contention

Notable points of contention incorporate concerns about the allocation of funds and the effectiveness of the directed programs. Some critics question whether the funding amounts are adequate to meet the demand for mental health services, particularly for crisis intervention and treatment of substance abuse disorders. Moreover, the integration of mental health treatment within county jails for offenders could spark debates over the appropriateness and implications of providing such services in a correctional setting.