Oklahoma Senate Bill SB455

Oklahoma 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/6/23
• Refer: 2/7/23

Caption

Federal actions; prohibiting implementation or enforcement of certain federal actions found unconstitutional. Effective date.

Impact

If enacted, SB455 would significantly affect how Oklahoma interacts with federal regulations and directives. The bill prohibits any state, county, or publicly funded organization from enforcing any federal action that has been declared unconstitutional by a competent court. This could lead to the state rejecting federal pandemic guidelines, environmental regulations, and laws affecting other areas such as agriculture and education. The implication is a stronger assertion of state sovereignty, allowing Oklahoma to operate independently from federal oversight in a broader range of activities.

Summary

Senate Bill 455, introduced by Senator Bullard, addresses the relationship between Oklahoma state law and federal actions, specifically aiming to enhance the state's ability to review and potentially reject federal directives deemed unconstitutional. This bill amends current legislation to empower the Oklahoma Legislature to review executive orders, federal agency rules, and congressional actions based on their constitutionality. It empowers the state Attorney General to assess these federal actions and determine if Oklahoma should seek exemptions or challenge them in court.

Contention

Debate surrounding SB455 is likely to focus on the principles of state versus federal authority. Proponents argue that the bill is crucial for protecting the rights of Oklahomans from overreach by federal agencies, emphasizing the need for state control over local matters. Conversely, opponents may raise concerns about the potential consequences of rejecting federal regulations, particularly those related to health and safety, suggesting that the bill may jeopardize public welfare by diminishing regulatory oversight. Additionally, questions regarding the practicality of the bill's execution and its potential to lead to legal disputes with federal authorities are expected to be central to discussions.