Michigan Senate Bill SB0351

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/23/23
• Refer: 5/23/23
• Report Pass: 10/12/23
• Refer: 10/12/23
• Report Pass: 10/17/23
• Engrossed: 10/18/23
• Refer: 10/18/23
• Report Pass: 5/22/24
• Enrolled: 9/26/24
• Chaptered: 10/9/24
• Passed: 10/9/24

Caption

Civil rights: other; public breastfeeding antidiscrimination act; expand to protect public expression of human milk. Amends title & sec. 2 of 2014 PA 197 (MCL 37.232).

Impact

The passage of SB 351 is expected to have a significant positive impact on state laws by strengthening civil rights protections for breastfeeding individuals. It explicitly disallows any actions that could prevent individuals from enjoying services and facilities due to breastfeeding. This amendment represents a proactive move to safeguard and normalize breastfeeding within public spaces and enhance the support for nursing mothers. It sends a message that public expression of breastfeeding is not just tolerated but supported legally.

Summary

Senate Bill 351 aims to expand the protections granted under Michigan's breastfeeding laws. Specifically, it amends the existing legislation to reinforce and clarify the right of individuals to breastfeed and express human milk in public accommodations. The bill's primary focus is on prohibiting businesses and public service providers from discriminating against individuals based on their breastfeeding status, thus promoting a more inclusive environment for nursing mothers. It aims to ensure that breastfeeding is treated equally alongside other consumer rights.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB 351 has been supportive of its measures to enhance rights for breastfeeding individuals. Advocates for breastfeeding rights, including various maternal and child health organizations, have lauded the bill for eliminating barriers that nursing mothers face in public spaces. However, there are concerns from some business groups regarding the potential for increased liability and the compliance burden this law might impose if interpreted too broadly.

Contention

The discussion surrounding SB 351 has identified some notable points of contention. While the overall sentiment is in favor of the bill, detractors argue that enforcing such a mandate could lead to misunderstandings and excessive claims against businesses. There is an ongoing conversation about how to balance the rights of breastfeeding mothers and the operational realities of public accommodations, with some suggesting that additional training and guidance may be necessary to ensure that businesses can comply without facing undue hardships.