Michigan Senate Bill SB0441

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/28/23
• Refer: 6/28/23
• Report Pass: 9/27/23
• Refer: 9/27/23
• Report Pass: 10/4/23
• Engrossed: 10/5/23
• Refer: 10/5/23
• Report Pass: 10/31/23
• Enrolled: 11/9/23
• Chaptered: 12/29/23
• Passed: 12/29/23

Caption

Natural resources: fishing; certain requirements for charter boat operators, commercial fishers, and wholesale dealers of fish; modify. Amends secs. 44508, 44524, 47325, 47327 & 47333 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.44508 et seq.).

Impact

The proposed measures will modify existing state laws governing natural resources management, specifically targeting fishing regulations. By implementing more stringent reporting requirements, such as twice-monthly catch activity reports, SB0441 seeks to gather comprehensive data on fish populations and fishing activities. This information will support wildlife management efforts and help address ecological concerns. The bill empowers the Department of Natural Resources to enforce compliance, suspend licenses for non-compliance, and impose civil penalties for reporting failures, thus emphasizing a more structured oversight of fisheries.

Summary

Senate Bill 441 (SB0441) focuses on amending certain provisions related to the management of fishing practices in Michigan. It establishes requirements for commercial fishers, charter boat operators, and wholesale fish dealers, mandating regular reporting and record-keeping regarding catch activities. The bill introduces a 'catch activity committee' to enhance oversight and adjust reporting requirements based on fishing data, aimed at promoting sustainable practices while ensuring that the interests of the fishing industry are adequately represented.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB0441 appears to be supportive within environmental circles, as it aims to bolster sustainable fishing practices and protect fish populations. However, some within the fishing community may express reservations about the increased reporting requirements, viewing them as burdensome or a potential threat to their operations. Overall, discussions reflect a balance between environmental conservation and the economic realities faced by the fishing industry.

Contention

Notable points of contention center on the reporting requirements and the potential implications for smaller charter boat operators and fish dealers. Critics of the bill may argue that the compliance burden could disproportionately affect small businesses that may lack the infrastructure to maintain detailed records or submit reports on a frequent basis. Furthermore, there are concerns regarding the transparency and functioning of the catch activity committee, particularly whether it will effectively represent the interests of all stakeholders in the fishing industry.