Maryland 2023 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB367

Introduced
1/26/23  
Refer
1/26/23  

Caption

Vehicle Laws - Stop Sign Monitoring Systems - Authorization

Impact

One significant impact of HB 367 is the provision allowing civil penalties for violations recorded by these monitoring systems to be limited based on the annual income of the vehicle's owner. The penalties range in amounts, ensuring that low-income individuals are not unduly burdened. This progressive approach is intended to create an equitable system of traffic enforcement that takes into account the financial circumstances of violators.

Summary

House Bill 367, introduced by Delegate Charkoudian, authorizes local jurisdictions in Maryland to implement stop sign monitoring systems, provided they are sanctioned by local laws. The bill outlines specific prerequisites for installation, which include conducting public engagement and proving the monitoring system's potential to reduce the need for officer intervention during stop sign violations. This legislation aims to enhance traffic safety while allowing communities to adapt measures for better road usage management.

Contention

However, the bill has faced opposition, particularly concerning the conditions under which monitoring data can be shared. HB 367 strictly prohibits local jurisdictions from using this data for immigration enforcement purposes, a point which some critics worry will limit the effectiveness of the monitoring systems in addressing broader community safety concerns. The balance between ensuring local control and adhering to state-wide regulations may continue to provoke debate among lawmakers and constituents.

Provisions

Additional provisions include that the total revenue generated by civil penalties must be reinvested into pedestrian safety programs, thus supporting broader community goals. Notably, the implementation process will involve a thorough evaluation of traffic safety data before establishing monitoring systems, ensuring that these measures address specific community needs rather than serving purely punitive functions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MD HB364

Prince George's County - Stop Sign Monitoring Systems - Authorization PG 301-24

MD HB1226

Baltimore City and Takoma Park - Stop Sign Monitoring Systems - Authorization

MD SB600

Baltimore City and Takoma Park - Stop Sign Monitoring Systems - Authorization of Pilot Program

MD HB1032

Baltimore City and Montgomery County - Stop Sign Monitoring Systems - Authorization MC 4-25

MD HB206

Vehicle Laws - Bus Obstruction Monitoring Systems and Bus Stop Zones

MD SB229

Vehicle Laws - Noise Abatement Monitoring Systems - Authorization, Use, and Penalties

MD HB1130

Vehicle Laws - Noise Abatement Monitoring Systems - Authorization, Use, and Penalties

MD SB808

Prince George's County - Stop Sign Monitoring Systems - School Bus Stops

MD HB348

Motor Vehicles - Speed Monitoring Systems - Safety Corridors

MD SB520

Motor Vehicles - Speed Monitoring Systems - Safety Corridors

Similar Bills

CA AB382

Pedestrian safety: school zones: speed limits.

MN SF912

Bill Dooley Bicycle Safety Act

CA SB671

Pedestrian crossing signals.

CA AB2264

Pedestrian crossing signals.

MN HF677

Active transportation finance and policy provisions governed, and money appropriated.

MD HB1032

Baltimore City and Montgomery County - Stop Sign Monitoring Systems - Authorization MC 4-25

MD SB600

Baltimore City and Takoma Park - Stop Sign Monitoring Systems - Authorization of Pilot Program

MD HB1226

Baltimore City and Takoma Park - Stop Sign Monitoring Systems - Authorization