Maryland 2025 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB600

Introduced
1/27/25  
Refer
1/27/25  
Report Pass
3/13/25  
Engrossed
3/14/25  
Refer
3/15/25  
Report Pass
4/5/25  
Enrolled
4/7/25  
Chaptered
5/13/25  

Caption

Baltimore City and Takoma Park - Stop Sign Monitoring Systems - Authorization of Pilot Program

Impact

If enacted, SB600 will amend existing Maryland laws to allow for the use of automated monitoring systems to enforce stop sign regulations. The bill specifically allocates a percentage of the fines collected - 50% - to the local management board for Baltimore City, earmarking these funds for youth programming and services. This financial allocation underscores the bill's multifaceted approach to not just enforcement but also community engagement and support, fostering safer streets while benefitting local youth initiatives.

Summary

Senate Bill 600, titled 'Baltimore City and Takoma Park – Stop Sign Monitoring Systems – Authorization of Pilot Program', seeks to authorize the implementation of stop sign monitoring systems in designated areas, particularly in school zones. The bill establishes a framework for local jurisdictions to enact the use of these systems via local law, coupled with public consultation processes. It mandates the collection of fines from violations recorded by these systems, which is aimed at enhancing traffic safety and reducing violations in critical areas.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB600 appears to be supportive, particularly from safety advocates who argue that monitoring systems can help reduce traffic violations and accidents in areas frequented by pedestrians, especially children. However, concerns have been raised regarding the potential for these systems to unfairly penalize drivers and the implications of automated enforcement. Critics express worries about the fairness of such systems and the reliance on technology for law enforcement.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the discussion over the fairness of civil penalties issued via automated systems as these penalties can be substantial for drivers who might be cited without immediate verification from an officer. Some stakeholders question the effectiveness of the bill in truly curbing violations versus generating revenue. There are also concerns about the transparency and oversight of contractors that would manage the stop sign monitoring systems, ensuring that they do not profit unduly from the citations issued.

Companion Bills

MD HB1226

Crossfiled Baltimore City and Takoma Park - Stop Sign Monitoring Systems - Authorization

Similar Bills

MD HB700

Talbot County – Speed Monitoring Systems – Intersection of Maryland Route 333 (Oxford Road) and Bonfield Avenue

MD HB1262

Talbot County - Speed Monitoring Systems - Intersection of Maryland Route 333 (Oxford Road) and Bonfield Avenue

MD SB642

Harford County - Vehicle Height Monitoring Systems

MD SB450

Baltimore County - Speed Monitoring Systems - Residential Districts and Mailing of Citations

MD SB1067

Baltimore County - Speed Monitoring Systems - Interstate 695

MD HB1502

Baltimore County - Speed Monitoring Systems - Interstate 695

MD HB371

Prince George's County - Speed Monitoring Systems - Maryland Route 5 PG 308-25

MD SB338

Baltimore County - Speed Monitoring Systems - Interstate 695 and Interstate 83