Michigan Senate Bill SB0740

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/24
• Refer: 3/6/24
• Report Pass: 6/18/24
• Refer: 6/18/24
• Report Pass: 6/25/24
• Engrossed: 6/26/24
• Refer: 6/26/24
• Report Pass: 9/25/24
• Enrolled: 12/5/24
• Chaptered: 12/30/24
• Passed: 12/30/24

Caption

Occupations: plumbers; ratio of apprentices to journey or master licensees on a jobsite; provide for plumbers and modify for electricians. Amends sec. 1117 of 2016 PA 407 (MCL 339.6117) & adds sec. 1117a.

Impact

One of the most significant changes introduced by SB 740 is the requirement for a defined ratio of journey or master plumbers supervising apprentices on job sites. The law sets a maximum ratio of 1:2, meaning one journey or master plumber can supervise no more than two apprentices at any given time. This provision is designed to uphold quality training standards, ensuring that apprentices receive adequate guidance and hands-on experience. Additionally, penalties for plumbing contractors who fail to comply with this supervisory ratio include substantial fines and potential suspension of licenses, thereby reinforcing accountability in the sector.

Summary

Senate Bill 740, also known as the Act to Revise and Consolidate the Laws Regarding Skilled Trades, aims to amend existing regulations surrounding the apprenticeship of plumbers in Michigan. The bill specifically focuses on the registration process for apprentice plumbers, stipulating that they must register within 30 days of employment and clarifying that apprenticeship registrations are only valid for five years unless the apprentice has applied for a journey license. This establishes a more structured framework for managing the workforce in the plumbing trade, which can be seen as a step towards ensuring a higher standard of training and professionalism in the field.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 740 appears largely supportive among professionals within the plumbing industry, as it enhances the framework for training and oversight of apprentices. Many argue that the structured supervision and standardized registration process will elevate the skill levels of new entrants in the plumbing trade. However, there may be concerns among contractors regarding the financial burdens imposed by the new regulations, especially related to the fines for non-compliance. Overall, the bill seems to reflect a growing emphasis on occupational safety and workforce competency in skilled trades.

Contention

While the bill is generally perceived positively, some debate exists around the practical implications of enforcing the 1:2 supervision ratio. Critics might argue that this could limit the capacity of plumbing businesses, especially small contractors, to take on apprentices due to the increased labor costs and logistical challenges posed by the regulations. Furthermore, any immediate impact on hiring practices or operational efficiency within plumbing companies could evoke pushback from members of the trade who feel the constraints could hinder their business operations.